Last Tuesday, I had lunch with Robin Hanson, a professor of economics at George Mason University. He is one of the most interesting thinkers in economics and technology, with his own unique connection to Bitcoin.
Robin is probably most famous for prediction markets. To fix ideas, a prediction market is simply a way for anyone to bet on any outcome, like who will win the next presidential election, what the inflation rate will be, whether Apple should replace its CEO, or what the global temperature will be in a year. Any event is possible in a prediction market, no matter how big or how small. Like him, I agree that prediction markets are one of the untapped opportunities of our time, with the potential to radically reshape the social landscape and use market forces to discipline decision-makers like never before.
The benefits of a prediction market are two-fold. First, the immediate benefit is that it allows markets to exist in places they traditionally have not. As the classical economist Edgeworth noted, markets allow trade, and introducing markets makes everyone better off. Today, stock markets allow investors to express their views on the value of a share of a company. Prediction markets will allow this for a much wider domain of events.
The second, longer-term benefit is that it will discipline authorities. Because people can bet one way or another with real money on the line, there will be no better truth than the market price of that event (provided enough people participate). Over time this can have effects on social, political, and corporate decision-making that will be impossible to ignore. This would be one way to hold elected officials, CEOs, and even your local HOA president accountable. The follow-on effects are profound and hard to predict exactly, typical of radical innovations.
Prediction markets have come and gone here in the US over the last decade. You may remember In Trade during the Bush-Gore election, when the probability of Bush winning against Gore was the start of every lunchtime conversation I remember from graduate school. Robin Hanson was an early advocate of prediction markets, and advised Augur, the prediction market on top of Ethereum.
The State of Prediction Markets Today
Right now, prediction markets are in hibernation. Augur never really took off. Hanson's efforts now are to help entrepreneurs develop specific use cases rather than broad tools and platforms, which have largely fallen flat in the marketplace. One big open space is within companies. In fact, Hanson advised a prior company that tried to replace focus groups with prediction markets. The challenge is that no organization or company wants to allow a market that would threaten their existing power structure. No CEO would adopt a prediction market that asks if he should be replaced.
Prediction in Bitcoin
As the father of prediction markets, Hanson influenced several early Bitcoiners, including Paul Sztorc, the founder of Truthcoin. The chief problem in a decentralized prediction market is how the system knows that some event happened, and therefore, who the winners are. Computer science calls this the winner determination problem, and in a decentralized setting, it is called the oracle problem.
Sztorc proposed a clever solution to this, where individuals on the Bitcoin network (“Voters”) would put their own coins at risk to verify the veracity of an event. For example, if the event is the global temperature in a year, these voters would announce the temperature, and the protocol would reward or penalize these voters based on consensus on the network. Because money is at risk, this forces these voters to report honestly. If this sounds like proof-of-stake, it essentially is an early version of it. And that's probably why it never received broad appeal within the Bitcoin community. When I met Sztorc for lunch at BTC++ last April in Austin, we talked about innovation in Bitcoin and the various uses of the blockchain. We both agree, like most Bitcoiners, that blockchain technology has very few use cases outside of money. But prediction markets may be the only such exception.
Nonetheless, Sztorc is now trying to build out the foundation for more innovation around Bitcoin through a company he founded called Layer 2 Labs, whose chief mission is to push the adoption of BIP300, which allows for sidechains that would exist alongside the Bitcoin blockchain. You can think of Lightning as the most famous example of this, but there could be others where entrepreneurs experiment with novel technologies (like a prediction market) that still settles in the world's most scarce commodity.
Personally, I would love to see some kind of prediction market on Bitcoin grow. But the truth is, I don't see a path forward right now. Hanson's exhortation to start with specific use cases that a company will pay for, and Sztorc's frustration with the Bitcoin community's resistance to adopting innovation in the protocol, are real barriers. Bitcoiners are right to stay laser-focused on digital sound money, to separate from most of the superfluous applications in the blockchain space. Once the altcoin community dies down, there may be more appetite for expanding around the protocol to allow for more novel applications. My bet is still on prediction markets as the single best alternative use of the blockchain, as immutable time stamping is a necessary first step in establishing a benchmark of ground truth.
The Cypherpunks
From 1984 to 1993, Hanson was an engineer and software developer in the Bay Area. He attended the occasional meetings of the Cypherpunks, which was an in-person version of the cryptography mailing list on which Bitcoin was ultimately released. Some of the giants of Bitcoin history came to these meetings, including Hal Finney, Nick Szabo, and Timothy May. Hanson attended as a relatively young guy in the crowd, but he heard from all the greats.
Back then, technology was way more fringe in the Bay Area than it is now. The area was dominated by the usual suspects: bankers, doctors, lawyers, and accountants. Engineers were far in the background. The Cypherpunk community had an undercurrent of science fiction. With that science fiction came a strong streak of optimism. These techno-libertarians shared a suspicion of central power (both corporate and political), and a sense of awe and wonder for the power of technology to radically reshape human existence. That unique blend of cryptography, privacy, individual sovereignty, and technology is best captured in the Cypherpunk Manifesto, which I recommend you read. Discussions about the fears of AI today would not last long in this group. The Cypherpunks always had a revolutionary, iconoclastic spirit, deeply skeptical of central power; in some sense, much like the founding fathers of America.
Bitcoin emerged directly out of this community, and it is this community that deserves credit for creating one of the greatest innovations of our time. Who are the Cypherpunks of today? What are they working on? What principles do they follow? And what new radical breakthroughs will they generate? Robin Hanson was lucky enough to break bread with the Cypherpunks in person. But it is up to us to carry the torch of Liberty and cryptography around its next lap.
This is the free monthly edition of Principles of Bitcoin. For a more detailed and frank analysis, upgrade to a paid subscription.
For the rest of the summer, I am launching a buy one get two free special. If you subscribe to any of my Substacks, you will receive a complimentary subscription to the other two. The three Substacks I write are Korok’s Korner, Principles of Bitcoin, and Letter from Aggieland.